Table 1. Comparison of general information of the two groups of study subjectsTable 1. Comparison of general information of the two groups of study subjects 表1. 两组研究对象一般资料对比
Table 2. Comparison of serum 25-(OH)D levels between patients infected with CT and those not infectedTable 2. Comparison of serum 25-(OH)D levels between patients infected with CT and those not infected 表2. 感染CT与未感染CT的患者的血清25-(OH)D水平对比
感染组
是否治愈
例数
血清25-(OH)D水平(nmol/L)
p值
阳性(40例)
治愈
23
41.37 ± 21.03
未治愈
17
29.47 ± 16.66
0.048
Table 3. Vitamin D levels and treatment outcome of CT infectionTable 3. Vitamin D levels and treatment outcome of CT infection 表3. 维生素D水平与CT感染的治疗效果
References
Taira, T., Broussard, N. and Bugg, C. (2022) Pelvic Inflammatory Disease: Diagnosis and Treatment in the Emergency Department. Emergency Medicine Practice, 24, 1-24.
李会平, 霍新年. 不孕不育夫妇生殖道解脲支原体、沙眼衣原体感染及抗精子抗体、抗子宫内膜抗体关系探讨[J]. 中国优生与遗传杂志, 2014, 23(7): 108-109.
柳雨雨, 袁涛, 李海鸿, 等. 维生素D治疗多囊卵巢综合征有效性的meta分析[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2020, 20(6): 81-87.
张婷婷, 杨君, 王慧玲. 血清维生素D和C-反应蛋白水平与多囊卵巢综合征发病的相关性分析[J]. 新乡医学院学报, 2021, 38(10): 949-952.
杨伟杰, 赵伟盘, 刘永亮. 等维生素D受体研究进展[J]. 河南科技学院学报(自然科学版), 2019, 47(5): 46-51.
曹蕾, 上官改珍, 白露. 1,25-(OH)
2D
3在宫颈良性病变和宫颈癌患者中的表达水平及临床意义[J]. 实用癌症杂志, 2019, 34(9): 1409-1411.
尹俊杨, 叶元. 维生素D及其受体在妇科癌症中的研究进展[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2022, 30(6): 1129-1132.
韦成厚, 韩立薇, 张婧, 等. 维生素D在子宫内膜异位症免疫发病机制中的作用研究[J]. 中国现代医药杂志, 2022(8): 19-22.
王子豪, 周建政, 王美霎, 等. 子宫肌瘤与维生素D关系的研究进展[J]. 国际妇产科学杂志, 2021(5): 543-547.
刘彩霞. 高剂量维生素D补充剂对绝经后骨质疏松症患者骨代谢标志物、骨密度的影响[J]. 妇儿健康导刊, 2024(3): 22-24, 28.
Gembillo, G., Cernaro, V., Salvo, A., Siligato, R., Laudani, A., Buemi, M., et al. (2019) Role of Vitamin D Status in Diabetic Patients with Renal Disease. Medicina, 55, Article No. 273. >https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55060273
Ramanathan, B., Davis, E.G., Ross, C.R. and Blecha, F. (2002) Cathelicidins: Microbicidal Activity, Mechanisms of Action, and Roles in Innate Immunity. Microbes and Infection, 4, 361-372. >https://doi.org/10.1016/s1286-4579(02)01549-6
Wang, T., Nestel, F.P., Bourdeau, V., Nagai, Y., Wang, Q., Liao, J., et al. (2004) Cutting Edge: 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 Is a Direct Inducer of Antimicrobial Peptide Gene Expression. The Journal of Immunology, 173, 2909-2912. >https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.173.5.2909
Gombart, A.F., Borregaard, N. and Koeffler, H.P. (2005) Human Cathelicidin Antimicrobial Peptide (CAMP) Gene Is a Direct Target of the Vitamin D Receptor and Is Strongly Up‐Regulated in Myeloid Cells by 1,25‐Dihydroxyvitamin D
3. The FASEB Journal, 19, 1067-1077. >https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.04-3284com
Christakos, S., Dhawan, P., Liu, Y., Peng, X. and Porta, A. (2003) New Insights into the Mechanisms of Vitamin D Action. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, 88, 695-705. >https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.10423
Adams, J.S., Ren, S., Liu, P.T., Chun, R.F., Lagishetty, V., Gombart, A.F., et al. (2009) Vitamin D-Directed Rheostatic Regulation of Monocyte Antibacterial Responses. The Journal of Immunology, 182, 4289-4295. >https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0803736