Table 2. Comparison of CD4 level and viral load after treatment between the two groupsTable 2. Comparison of CD4 level and viral load after treatment between the two groups 表2. 两组治疗后CD4水平、病毒载量比较
组别
n
CD (cells/μL)
病毒载量(copies/ml)
研究组
28
412 (305~628)
0 (0~0)
对照组
28
424 (306~532)
0 (0~0)
Z
−0.508
−1.633
P
0.611
0.103
Table 3. Comparison of clinical data between the two groups after treatmentTable 3. Comparison of clinical data between the two groups after treatment 表3. 两组治疗后临床数据比较
Table 4. Comparison of CD4 level and viral load before and after treatment between the two groupsTable 4. Comparison of CD4 level and viral load before and after treatment between the two groups 表4. 两组组内治疗前后CD4水平、病毒载量比较
Table 5. Comparison of adverse reactions between the two groups of HIV-infected people taking antiviral drugs [n (%)]Table 5. Comparison of adverse reactions between the two groups of HIV-infected people taking antiviral drugs [n (%)] 表5. 两组艾滋病病毒感染者服用抗病毒药物不良反应发生情况比较[n (%)]
References
WHO (2022) HIV/AIDS. >https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hiv-aids
中华医学会感染病学分会艾滋病丙型肝炎学组, 中国疾病预防控制中心. 中国艾滋病诊疗指南(2021年版) [J].协和医学杂志, 2022, 13(2): 203-226. >https://doi.org/10.12290/xhyxzz.2022-0097
Costa, B. and Vale, N. (2022) Efavirenz: History, Development and Future. Biomolecules, 13, Article 88. >https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13010088
朱志强, 姜太一, 刘安, 等. 奈韦拉平和依非韦伦用于抗HIV治疗的长期疗效和安全性比较[J]. 中国艾滋病性病, 2014, 20(11): 809-811. >https://doi.org/10.13419/j.cnki.aids.2014.11.005
李爱新, 王爱芝, 李在村, 等. 依非韦伦更换为洛匹那韦/利托那韦后对AIDS病人睡眠障碍焦虑抑郁影响的初步研究[J]. 中国艾滋病性病, 2017, 23(9): 784-787. >https://doi.org/10.13419/j.cnki.aids.2017.09.04
曹明雪, 黄琳, 封宇飞. 依非韦伦不良反应的文献分析[J]. 临床药物治疗杂志, 2021, 19(3): 31-35.
Ford, N., Shubber, Z., Pozniak, A., Vitoria, M., Doherty, M., Kirby, C., et al. (2015) Comparative Safety and Neuropsychiatric Adverse Events Associated with Efavirenz Use in First-Line Antiretroviral Therapy. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 69, 422-429. >https://doi.org/10.1097/qai.0000000000000606
World Health Organization (2019) Update of Recommendations on First-and Second-Line Antiretroviral Regimens. WHO Press.
Dubrocq, G. and Rakhmanina, N. (2018) The Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Clinical Role of Fixed Dose Combination of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate, Lamivudine and Reduced Dose Efavirenz (TLE-400) in Treating HIV-1 Infection. Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism&Toxicology, 14, 773-779. >https://doi.org/10.1080/17425255.2018.1498840
Carey, D. (2014) Efavirenz 400 Mg Daily Remains Non-inferior to 600 Mg: 96 Week Data from the Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled ENCORE1 Study. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 17, Article 19523. >https://doi.org/10.7448/ias.17.4.19523
Xu, L., Peng, W., Song, X., Li, Y., Han, Y., Zhu, T., et al. (2021) Pharmacodynamics of Efavirenz 400 Mg in Treatment-Naïve Chinese Hiv-Infected Patients in a Prospective Cohort Study. BMC Infectious Diseases, 21, Article No. 112. >https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-05802-8
李辉, 曹应琼, 程亚光, 阮师漫. 依非韦伦400mg剂量进行艾滋病抗病毒治疗的研究进展[J]. 中国艾滋病性病, 2021, 27(8): 903-906. >https://doi.org/10.13419/j.cnki.aids.2021.08.29
Huang, W., Huang, C., Huang, S., Lin, S., Ou, S., Chen, Y., et al. (2021) Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Study on the Switch from Coformulated 600-mg Efavirenz, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate, and Emtricitabine to Coformulated 400-mg Efavirenz, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate, and Lamivudine among HIV-Positive Patients with Viral Suppression. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection, 54, 944-951. >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2020.06.010
Xiao, J., Xiao, J., Liu, Y., Li, B., Zhang, L., Han, J., et al. (2022) Efficacy and Safety of Efavirenz 400 mg-Based Regimens Switching from 600 Mg-Based Regimens in People Living with HIV with Virological Suppression in China: A Randomized, Open-Label, Non-Inferiority Study. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 117, 48-55. >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2022.01.051
刘欢霞. HIV/AIDS成年患者TDF + 3TC + EFV初始抗病毒治疗前瞻性队列研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南充: 川北医学院, 2017. >https://doi.org/10.27755/d.cnki.gcbyx.2017.000005
梁辉勇, 丁亚, 彭小青, 等. 三种常用高效抗逆转录病毒治疗方案疗效的比较[J]. 中国医院药学杂志, 2021, 41(19): 1998-2000, 2005. >https://doi.org/10.13286/j.1001-5213.2021.19.13
ENCORE1 Study Group (2014) Efficacy of 400 mg Efavirenz versus Standard 600 mg Dose in HIV-Infected, Antiretroviral-Naive Adults (ENCORE1): A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Non-Inferiority Trial. Lancet, 383, 1474-1482. >https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62187-X
ENCORE1 Study Group, Carey, D., Puls, R., et al. (2015) Efficacy and Safety of Efavirenz 400 mg Daily versus 600 mg Daily: 96-Week Data from the Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Non-Inferiority ENCORE1 Study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 15, 793-802.